Tuesday, 25 December 2012
Monday, 10 December 2012
Rolls Royce phantom vs bentley mulsanne
Rolls Royce phantom vs bentley mulsanne |
luxury features 7.8 vs 10.0
Winner: Phantom
Enjoy additional natural light with the Phantom 's standard sun roof
safety features 9.2 vs 10.0
Winner: Phantom
The Phantom has 1 more airbag (including Side), 5 vs 4
entertainment system 7.9 vs 8.2
Winner: Phantom
Luxury Features
BENTLEY
MULSANNE ROLLS-ROYCEPHANTOM
moon roof Not Available vs Standard Enjoy additional natural light with the Phantom 's standard sun roof
power seats Standard vs Standard Both have power seats
keyless entry Standard vs Standard Both have keyless entry
leather Standard vs Standard Both come standard with leather interiors
Safety Features
BENTLEY
MULSANNE ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM
antilock brakes Standard vs Standard Both come standard with ABS brakes
stability control system Yes vs Yes Both have electronic stability control
airbags 4 vs 5 The Phantom has a good number of airbags, but the Mulsanne is just OK
rear brakes Disc vs Disc Both have the usual brakes for this class of vehicle
child door locks Standard vs Standard Child door locks come standard
roadside assistance system None vs None
BENTLEY
MULSANNE ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM
number of speakers 14 vs 15 More speakers
has speed sensitive volume No vs Yes The Phantom 's stereo cranks the volume to compensate for road noise, but the Mulsanne does not
cd player Standard vs Standard CD player comes standard
premium radio Optional vs Standard Have your pick of music from around the world with the Phantom 's satellite radio; in the Mulsanne , too, but it'll cost
has auxiliary audio input Yes vs Yes Both have an audio-in jack so you can plug in your own MP3 player to the stereo
has subwoofer No vs No Neither has a subwoofer; audio won't have that deep thumping bass sound
entertainment system Standard vs Optional Both cars offer an entertainment system for passengers, but it'll cost extra to get it on the Phantom
Crash Test Ratings
BENTLEY
MULSANNE ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM
passengers 4 vs 5 The Phantom has lots of passenger seats and the Mulsanne is OK, too
highway driving range 455 miles vs 475 miles Good highway range
cargo space 15.6 ft3 vs Unknown
front seats Unknown vs Unknown
folding rear seats Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers a folding rear seat
power outlets Standard vs Not Available The Mulsanne 's standard power outlets will keep your gadgets charged; not available on the Phantom
roof rails Not Available vs Not Available Neither offers roof rails
navigation system Standard vs Standard Both come standard with navigation systems
cupholders 4 vs 4 Both have lots of cupholders
front air conditioning Standard vs Standard A/C for hot summer days comes standard
Road Tests
BENTLEY
MULSANNE ROLLS-ROYCE PHANTOM
horsepower 505 HP @ 4,200 RPM vs 453 HP @ 5,350 RPM Average power
number of gears 8 vs 6 The Mulsanne has more gears and the Phantom is OK, too
transmission Automatic transmission vs Automatic transmission Both only offer an automatic transmission, unlike most in this class
paddle shifters Standard vs Standard Both come standard with paddle shifters
air compressor Twin turbocharger vs None The Mulsanne 's Twin turbocharger lets it maximize power output, quite rare for this class of vehicle
power-to-weight ratio 11.3 lb/hp vs 12.8 lb/hp Both Mulsanne and Phantom are sluggish relative to their competitors
drivetrain type rear-wheel drive vs rear-wheel drive Both have the usual drivetrain for this class of vehicle
curb-to-curb turning radius Unknown vs 45.3 ft
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price is
$353,240
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
$353,240
Condition:New
Engine:6.6L 48V turbo V12 engine -inc: variable valve tim
Transmission:8 Spd Automatic
Drivetrain:Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Color:Black
Interior Color:Moccasin w/ Black Contrast
Warranty:Full Factory Warranty
City MPG:
13
Hwy MPG:
20
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
Rolls Royce Phantom extended wheelbase 2013 price |
Sunday, 9 December 2012
bmw x1 review 2013 usa
Saturday, 17 November 2012
2006 Dodge Charger
| 2006 Dodge Charger Introduced in,2006 Dodge Charger is a rear-drive full-size sedan. It shares platform and engines with Dodge Magnum and Chrysler 300. 2006 Charger seats five comes in three trim levels: SE with 3.5-liter V6, R/T with 5.7-liter V8, and SRT8 with 6.1-liter V8. The 5.7 V8 has Chrysler's Multi-Displacement System, which deactivates four cylinders while cruising to save fuel. All 2006 Chargers have 5-speed automatic transmissions. ABS and traction/antiskid control are optional on SE, standard on others. Available on all are front side airbags and curtain side airbags. R/T, and SRT8 models have firmer suspension tuning. SRT8s add Brembo-brand brakes and specific trim. Split folding rear seatbacks are standard on all but SE. Available are adjustable pedals and a wireless cell phone link. Available for R/T is the Road/Track Performance Group that boosts engine output to 350 hp and adds special suspension tuning. A Daytona R/T Package adds throatier exhaust tuning and unique trim. Consumer Guide® Automotive places each vehicle into one of 17 classes based on size, price, and market position. Large Cars comprise the biggest passenger sedans and wagons. Large, inside and out, they also include the only 6-passenger cars. Large Cars offer lots of metal for the money and are dominated by domestic brands. Our Best Buys include Chrysler 300, 2006 Dodge Charger, Dodge Magnum, Ford Five Hundred, Mercury Montego, and Toyota Avalon. At this time we have no Recommended picks. |
---|
Dodge Charger 2006
| Dodge Charger 2006 Introduced in , Dodge Charger 2006 is a rear-drive full-size sedan. It shares platform and engines with Dodge Magnum and Chrysler 300. Charger seats five comes in three trim levels: SE with 3.5-liter V6, R/T with 5.7-liter V8, and SRT8 with 6.1-liter V8. The 5.7 V8 has Chrysler's Multi-Displacement System, which deactivates four cylinders while cruising to save fuel. All Chargers have 5-speed automatic transmissions. ABS and traction/antiskid control are optional on SE, standard on others. Available on all are front side airbags and curtain side airbags. R/T, and SRT8 models have firmer suspension tuning. SRT8s add Brembo-brand brakes and specific trim. Split folding rear seatbacks are standard on all but SE. Available are adjustable pedals and a wireless cell phone link. Available for R/T is the Road/Track Performance Group that boosts engine output to 350 hp and adds special suspension tuning. A Daytona R/T Package adds throatier exhaust tuning and unique trim. COMPETITION Consumer Guide® Automotive places each vehicle into one of 17 classes based on size, price, and market position. Large Cars comprise the biggest passenger sedans and wagons. Large, inside and out, they also include the only 6-passenger cars. Large Cars offer lots of metal for the money and are dominated by domestic brands. Our Best Buys include Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger 2006, Dodge Magnum, Ford Five Hundred, Mercury Montego, and Toyota Avalon. At this time we have no Recommended picks. |
---|
2012 Dodge Charger
| 2012 Dodge Charger The 2012 Dodge Charger ranks 5 out of 7 Affordable Large Cars. This ranking is based on our analysis of 14 published reviews and test drives of the Dodge Charger, and our analysis of reliability and safety data. With plenty of power and interior space, the 2012 Dodge Charger is an athletic alternative to competing affordable large cars. Reviewers agree that if you’re looking for a large car that doesn’t skimp on performance, it’s tough to beat the 2012 Dodge Charger. Thanks to a new, optional eight-speed automatic transmission, test drivers agree that the V6-powered Charger is no longer for bargain-basement shoppers who can’t afford the V8 model. “The 2012 Dodge Charger fares well as a large sedan,” writes Edmunds. “But when it comes to affordable performance, the Charger has no peer.” While V8-powered Chargers have always gotten the nod for performance, test drivers complained that the 2011 model fell short with its outdated transmission. Now that there’s an eight-speed automatic on the options list, they say the V6 Charger is the model of choice. It’s lighter and nimbler than the V8, and when equipped with the eight-speed automatic, the Charger delivers some of the best fuel economy in the segment. In the end, the Charger offers a level of practicality that matches most competing affordable large cars, but it also trumps many class leaders with engaging driving dynamics and performance that cars like the Toyota Avalon just can’t match. If you want the best of both worlds, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a car that walks the line better than the 2012 Dodge Charger. |
---|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)